<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Lifesaving Test Every Woman Should Have</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/</link>
	<description>Lifestyle And Health Information Centre</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sexy Boys Playground &#187; Archive &#187; Love Bugs You Don&#8217;t Want</title>
		<link>http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexy Boys Playground &#187; Archive &#187; Love Bugs You Don&#8217;t Want</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>[...] a pap test for females. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a pap test for females. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthyeric</title>
		<link>http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthyeric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthy-lifestyle.most-effective-solution.com/2008/01/14/top-5-lifesaving-test-every-woman-should-have/#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>Are these tests really as essential as they are hyped up to be I ask myself...certainly not looking to offend anyone here, or doctors who frequently administer and recommend these tests...but... there is a lot of information suggesting that mammograms for example are very inaccurate, that misdiagnoses are made on a pretty frequent basis, and that with each mammogram or exposure to radiation, you add a 1-2% chance of contracting the very cancer you're being tested for.

As for the whole cholesterol subject, it is becoming fairly mainstream knowledge that a lot of the so called facts are nothing but myths. A good book that touches base on this subject, but focuses mainly on statin drugs is "Hidden Truth about Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs" by Shane Elison. There is even suggestions, that people who have lower cholesterol have a higher chance of not surviving a heart attack, if they have one. 

As for the PAP test, well I don't know much about that, but I did see something about HPV (vaccine), which is yet another hoax, boldly sold to the public, which may even cause infertility.  

Then there's the mention of checking your skin, and that even if you STAY OUT OF THE SUN and take care of your skin, you can still get skin cancer.....OK...overexposure to the sun can be bad, but the sun is what really helps our bodies to fight all cancers, especially skin cancer. It is the toxic sunscreen, and toxmetics (cosmetics) that we apply to our skin that inhibits natural Vitamin D synthesis and absorption, polluting our bodies with chemicals that we would never eat, but may as well have, as they get easily absorbed through the skin.

And then colon cancer...another big one. Staying away from processed foods and especially sodium nitrate, a chemical preservative contained in all processed meats and most meat in general, will significantly up your chances of never having to deal with colon cancer. 

I'm sorry, but a lot of these tests really place the "fear" in people, some of which help to start a process which ultimatley increases your chances of becoming diseased, especially when you get put on a statin drug for cholesterol, or take human guinea pig vaccines to stop cervical cancer, or get exposed to radiation, which causes cancer, to be tested for cancer etc etc etc. Not looking to undermine these tests completely, but there's fact and there's fiction. Could some of these tests be based on premises and research which is fiction, carefully disguised as scientific fact? Something to consider I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these tests really as essential as they are hyped up to be I ask myself&#8230;certainly not looking to offend anyone here, or doctors who frequently administer and recommend these tests&#8230;but&#8230; there is a lot of information suggesting that mammograms for example are very inaccurate, that misdiagnoses are made on a pretty frequent basis, and that with each mammogram or exposure to radiation, you add a 1-2% chance of contracting the very cancer you&#8217;re being tested for.</p>
<p>As for the whole cholesterol subject, it is becoming fairly mainstream knowledge that a lot of the so called facts are nothing but myths. A good book that touches base on this subject, but focuses mainly on statin drugs is &#8220;Hidden Truth about Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs&#8221; by Shane Elison. There is even suggestions, that people who have lower cholesterol have a higher chance of not surviving a heart attack, if they have one. </p>
<p>As for the PAP test, well I don&#8217;t know much about that, but I did see something about HPV (vaccine), which is yet another hoax, boldly sold to the public, which may even cause infertility.  </p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the mention of checking your skin, and that even if you STAY OUT OF THE SUN and take care of your skin, you can still get skin cancer&#8230;..OK&#8230;overexposure to the sun can be bad, but the sun is what really helps our bodies to fight all cancers, especially skin cancer. It is the toxic sunscreen, and toxmetics (cosmetics) that we apply to our skin that inhibits natural Vitamin D synthesis and absorption, polluting our bodies with chemicals that we would never eat, but may as well have, as they get easily absorbed through the skin.</p>
<p>And then colon cancer&#8230;another big one. Staying away from processed foods and especially sodium nitrate, a chemical preservative contained in all processed meats and most meat in general, will significantly up your chances of never having to deal with colon cancer. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but a lot of these tests really place the &#8220;fear&#8221; in people, some of which help to start a process which ultimatley increases your chances of becoming diseased, especially when you get put on a statin drug for cholesterol, or take human guinea pig vaccines to stop cervical cancer, or get exposed to radiation, which causes cancer, to be tested for cancer etc etc etc. Not looking to undermine these tests completely, but there&#8217;s fact and there&#8217;s fiction. Could some of these tests be based on premises and research which is fiction, carefully disguised as scientific fact? Something to consider I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
